+
Industry and
Competitive Situation
Analysis
Alex Raney
Allen Hicks
Anthony Brown
Braden Walker
Christian Grandorf
+
Background of Columbia
Formed from a hat company into a sportswear company in
1938.
Create innovative outdoor apparel
Extremely popular international brand since the 1970’s
Forbes Top 100 most trustworthy companies
Apparel magazine Top 100 most innovative companies.
+
Background of Columbia
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pImbhMK7CIg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBgQpyxs6jQ
+
Industry Analysis
Very competitive
Seasonality
Innovation and technology
Global
+
Competition
Rapid growth
Hundreds of competitors
Unique customer offerings
+
Seasonality
Every company within the market faces seasonality
Different product lines
Strategy
+
Innovation and Technology
Under Armour- Kevin Plank 1996
Unique for whatever outdoor activity
+
Global
Distribution
Risk
Unique markets
2011
United States
LAAP
EMEA
Canada
Total
2010
2009
Net Sales
$ 948.0
341.0
275.4
129.6
% of Sale
s
Net Sales
56.0 % $ 881.0
20.1
263.4
16.3
222.4
7.6
116.7
% of Sale
s
Net Sales
59.4 % $ 736.9
17.7
203.2
15.0
197.4
7.9
106.5
% of Sale
s
59.2 %
16.3
15.9
8.6
$ 1,694.0
100.0 % $ 1,483.5
100.0 % $ 1,244.0
100.0 %
+
SWOT Analysis-Strengths
Cost position is lower than competitors
Product diversity
Extent of distribution
Continued growth year after year
+
SWOT Analysis-Weaknesses
No corporate owned manufacturing
Does not maintain long term contracts
Quality control issues
Affected by the unstable price of raw materials
High cost of transportation
+
SWOT Analysis-Opportunities
Expand the sales of their warm weather lines
Expand the OMNI Tech use in products
Continue to expand in the LAAP Region
Grow their direct to consumer sales
+
SWOT Analysis-Threats
Competitors expanding into their market
Increased regulation in manufacturing countries
Growing wages in manufacturing countries
+
Production Strategy
Production is outsourced to foreign manufacturers
Vietnam and China account for 70% of apparel production and
90% of footwear
Over one hundred independent manufacturers
Operates liaison offices in 7 countries, staffed by Columbia
employees
+
Transportation Strategy
Products are moved to their markets via ocean freight
Finished cotton goods imported into the United States incur a
15.9% tariff
+
Distribution Strategy
Products available in one hundred countries
Net Sales
United States
LAAP
EMEA
Canada
Total
% of Sales
947
56.70%
277
22.60%
236.6
13.80%
114.7
6.90%
1,669.60
100%
Uses a mix of independent distributors and direct to
consumer sales
+
Financial Analysis
Columbia Sportswear Company (COLM) stock on the NYSE has increased
from 57.07 to 83.25 in a Fifty Two week span (April 1, 2013 to April 1, 2014)
Columbia went public sixteen years ago and has since then grown by 473%
Currently valued at 2.83 billion dollars
34.6 million shares outstanding, 66% held by insiders
Revenue of 1.68 billion
Gross Profit of 743.66 million
Cash Flow of 274.27 million
Net Sales decreased 1% in 2013
+
Market Placement
Retail stores and outlets
Event sponsorships
Outfitting Olympic teams and
competitors
+
+
Under Armour
Target customers: Athletes, now trying to expand into casual
gear as well for the non-athletes
Company
Name
Revenues
Gross Net Income
Margi
n
EBITDA
Total Assets
Total
PE Market Employee Share
Liabilities Ratio
Cap
s
Price
Under 2,332,051,000 48.74 162,330,000 312,226,000 1,577,741,000 524,387,000 68.16 8,775 M
Armour
Inc.
Columbia 1,684,996,000 44.13
Sportswea
r Co.
94,341,000 171,794,000 1,605,588,000 360,170,000 29.558 2,783 M
8
7,800
102.24
4,320
80.40
+
The North Face
North Face is expected to double VF Corporation’s revenue
by 2015 to $3 billion a year.
Target Customers: aimed at college students, switching to a
more stylish apparel
The North Face is apart of the VF Corporation which is the
largest apparel company in the world.
+
Patagonia
Patagonia reached $540 million in revenues in 2011
Target customers: geared toward eco-friendly buyers
Patagonia focuses more on being green than any of its
competitors and even makes most of its apparel of recycled
materials.
+
Key Success Factor/
Competitive Variable
Weight
Columbia
Under
Armour
North
Face
Patagonia
Quality/product performance
.20
10
9
10
8
Reputation/image
.10
9
9
10
9
Raw material access/cost
.10
8
8
7
3
Technological skills
.10
10
8
7
7
Manufacturing capability
.15
10
10
9
10
Marketing/distribution
.20
7
9
5
4
Financial strength
.10
8
9
10
7
Relative cost position
.05
7
7
6
6
Overall strength rating
1.00
8.75
8.85
8.05
6.8