Arizona Space Grant Consortium Ultrasound as a Proposed Drug Release Mechanism in Biomedical Microrobots Presentation By: Malcolm Gibson UA Advanced Microsystems Laboratory Dept. of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Presentation Objectives • Project Introduction • Theory and Goals • Research and Results • Future Plans and Experiments • Conclusion and Acknowledgments • Questions and Discussion Introduction - Biomedical Microrobots • Biomicrorobotics research is focused on building submm sized, untethered robots for in-vivo medical applications. • Building a complete robotic system that “swims” inside the human body is quite a challenge and requires an innovative combination of Micro- and NanoTechnology. • Potential Applications: –Navigating the vitreous humor for retinal surgery. –Targeted drug delivery. – Small scale exploration. IRIS - ETH Zurich Introduction - Biomedical Microrobots • Research can be divided into two main areas: – Building the microrobots using MEMS/NEMS and robotic micro-assembly technologies. – Applying and controlling the microrobots for invivo applications. • Medical Imaging • Steering and Movement • Actuation IRIS - ETH Zurich Magnetic Steering and Guiding System • Developed by IRIS (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology) • The steering system uses two coaxial pairs of magnetic field generating coils in Helmholtz and Maxwell configurations respectively. IRIS - Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zurich) Co-Fluidic Encapsulation System • Creates uniform alginate droplets extruded in an oil phase. • Allows for encapsulation of microrobots. • Allows one to easily control the droplet size and extrusion rate. QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture. Pictures: MEMS Lab - Stephane Ritty, Dr. Enikov Drug Release Mechanisms • Current Method – Diffusion – Bare Robot Surface Coating • Proposed Method – Ultrasonically Induced Cavitation – Encapsulated Micro-Droplet Quic kTime™ and a dec ompres sor are needed to see this pic ture. Quic kTime™ and a dec ompres sor are needed to see this pic ture. IRIS - ETH Zurich Research - Investigating Ultrasound • Decided to use surfacecoated droplets as opposed to bare robots. – Robot Skin – Ferrite Powder • Droplets provided a larger drug entrapment matrix. QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture. QuickTime™ and a decompressor are needed to see this picture. Hypothesis: Can ultrasonically induced cavitation be used to destroy the droplet surface-coating (skin) and induce rapid, diffusive drug release to the surrounding fluidic environment. Experimental Procedure • General Procedure: – Create n droplets using the droplet extrusion system. – Create surface coating for all droplets. – Split droplets up into designated sample test tubes. – Sonicate samples for various time intervals using the laboratory aqua-sonic cleaner. – Apply a chromogenic substrate to the sample and measure the absorbance rate using the spectrophotometer. – Calculate HRP (drug substitute) concentration from the Absorbance rate and generate release curve. Experimental Results Ultrasound vs. Diffusion Comparative Release Curves 0.4 HRP Released (ug) 0.35 0.3 Skin vs. No Skin 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 0 20 40 60 80 Sonication Time (min.) Sonicated with Skin Vortexed Droplets Diffusion with Skin Diffusion No Skin 100 Vortex Visual Release Study Skin Bare Future Plans and Experiments • Test release with metal robots instead of Fe powder. – Engineer resonant robots that will resonate upon a certain ultrasonic frequency. – Use Piezoelectric elements or speakers to generate sound frequency. • This will allow control of the frequency. • Specific frequency would actuate droplet release. • Design resonant robots incorporating small air pockets to make sonication more effective. • Investigate the use of highfrequency magnetic pulsing to actuate drug release. • • Loop Robots Eddy Currents IRIS - ETH Zurich Acknowledgements Mentor: Dr. Eniko T. Enikov (AME) (Advanced Microsystems Laboratory) Arizona Space Grant Consortium Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Questions/Discussion Thank you for your attention. Questions? Comments? UA Advanced Microsystems Laboratory Dept. of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Malcolm T. Gibson Dr. Eniko T. Enikov The Chemistry Behind the Droplets Surface Skin Formation: Starting with a NaAlg. + HRP + Ferrite Powder Droplet NaAlg./Fe/ HRP Droplet CaCl2 solution Soaks for 4 min. Polyethylenimine solution Soaks for 5 min. Poly-l-lysine solution Calcium Chloride (Salt) crosslinks with NaAlg. Forming a tough, solid droplet. Soaks for 15 min. PEI creates a surface coating PLL is believed to leak into the NaAlg.+CaChl.crosslinking and (skin) around droplet shell. strengthen it. The Chemistry Behind the Droplets • Sodium Alginate was selected as a drug entrapment matrix because it is easy to process and there is evidence supporting successful magnetic modulation of drug release. • Sodium Alginate is a linear polysaccharide. – Cellulose fiber found in many plant cells. –These fibers have high strength and durability. –Comprised of mannuronic acid (M) and guluronic acid (G) residues. •Chained in a repeating pattern: GG-GM-MM-… The Chemistry Behind the Droplets HRP Enzyme as a Drug Substitute – Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP). •44,000 Da enzyme protein – Enzymes are proteins that catalyze chemical reactions. – They exert their catalytic activity upon substrates. – HRP readily bonds with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (contained in TMB substrate) and the resultant (HRP–H2O2) complex can oxidize a wide variety of chromogenic hydrogen donors, resulting in color change. •This is what is being measured using the spectrophotometer.