Modeling of cell’s functional regulatory networks in cancer using variable order fractional systems Supervisor I : Dr. Keivan Maghooli Supervisor II : Dr. Masoud Asadi Khiavi Advisor: Dr. Nader Jafainia Dabanloo Presentation: Hanif Yaghoobi Regulatory Network • a collection of DNA segments (genes or their products ) in a cell which interact with each other and with other substances in the cell, thereby governing the rates at which genes in the network are transcribed into mRNA. + + Translation Rate Translation Rate + + Gene Expressi on Level Protein Level GENE A Gene Expressi on Level Protein Level GENE B + + Transcription ? Rate Transcription - Rate ? ? ? ? - Data Required: Gene Expression Matrix t1 t2 t3 t4 g1 0 1 2 1 0 g2 1 2 1 0 1 1. g3 0 1 1 1. 1 0 g4 1 2 1 0 a1 a2 a3 a4 g1 0 3 1 1 g2 1 2 1 g3 0 1 g4 1 2 Snap Shot Time serious 5 Model formalisms • Many formalisms to model genetic regulatory networks Graphs Boolean equations precision abstraction Differential equations Stochastic master equations The first step in modeling is to determine the structure of the network. Then, a complete analysis of the dynamics of its components requires solving the Master Equations. By writing the master equations, this network is described as a dynamic system with nonlinear differential equations in state space. 6 Dynamic models • In systems theory, GRNs are complex nonlinear dynamic systems with time delays, and complex nonlinear dynamics can be found even within the simplified and constructive infrastructure of these systems. • Intrinsic properties of GRNs: A) Time Delay B) Non-Linear Dynamics C) Stochastic Dynamics D) Long Range Dependence (Epigenetic Long Term Memory ) E) Slow and Complex Dynamic Simplified form of GRN in the cell cycle based on the VOF system model Case Study . Gene network in the mammalian cancer cell during G1/s transition stage of cell cycle DataSet Gene expression time series data of cell cycle process are suitable for analysing GRNs. We used two sets of data. First is related to Human Primary Skin Fibroblasts throughout the Cell Cycle, which is a normal cell. This dataset is available under the access number E-TABM-263 at https://www.omicsdi.org/dataset. The second is the Human Cell Cycle in the Hela cell line, which is a cancer cell. This dataset is available at http://genome-www.stanford.edu/Human-CellCycle/HeLa/. Summary of Methodology Basic definitions Grünwald–Letnikov definition for the fractional variable order derivative Deterministic Solution Stochastic Solution dy(t ) dW f ( y (t ), t ) g ( y(t ), t ) dt dt General form of Stochastic Differential Equations W is the Wiener Process (Standard Brownian Process) (t ) Dt y (t ) d (t ) dt (t ) dW y (t ) f ( y (t ), t ) g ( y (t ), t ) dt Generalize to Variable Order Fractional EQ d (t ) y(t ) f ( y(t ), t )dt (t ) g ( y(t ), t )dWdt (t ) 1 Stochastic Solution Final Solution (tk ) y (t k ) f ( y (t k ), t k )h dW ~ dt N (0,1) g ( y(t ), t ) y(t ) (t ) 1 g ( y (t k ), t k )dWh k j (t j ) (1) j 1 j y (t k j ) GRN modeling by Delayed VOFS GRN modeling by Delayed VOFS GRN modeling by Delayed VOFS GRN modeling by Delayed VOFS Gi (t k 1 )dWt h (t )1 to the above equation, a It is easy to see that by adding system of stochastic equations is obtained for each gene node. Function Approximation for Variable Order In real systems, (t ) is a time-varying variable (parameter) that affects the system. In the GRN system, for example, this is most likely a time-varying temperature function. For phenomena such as biological systems, it is almost impossible to determine (t ) analytically. So in the optimistic case, (t ) is obtained through measurements as a time series of measurements. Function Approximation for Variable Order Expression Approximations for Data-less Genes Unfortunately, time series data similar to those for coding genes are not available for miRNAs and LNC-RNAs. Parameters Identification and Optimization The purpose of the parameter estimation step is to determine and optimize all system parameters so that the system's solved response (here predicted values of gene expression) has the least error with real data (here gene expression time series data). This is done by the Imperialist Competitive Algorithm (ICA). Results Results of Deterministic System Decision Tree Algorithm for Chaos Test 0-1 test 0-1 test uses a time series of data obtained from a dynamic system 8110 10 50 Chaos test Gene Name MYC E2F1 RB1 CDK4 CDC25A CDK2 CDKN1B miR-17-92 Without Change in parameters k -0.33 0.25 -0.11 0.26 0.38 -0.00 0.32 -0.21 Permutation Entropy 4.17 3.94 3.64 3.66 3.84 3.85 3.90 2.61 Result Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Change the Delay parameter 10 k 0.32 0.59 0.17 0.22 0.93 -0.18 0.03 0.38 Permutation Entropy 4.02 3.46 3.4 3.75 3.05 4.52 3.6 2.61 Result Periodic Chaotic Periodic Periodic Chaotic Periodic Periodic Periodic Change the MYC Self-Synthesis Rate parameter 50 1 k 0.87 0.29 -0.1 0.36 0.46 0.08 0.32 -0.21 Permutation Entropy 3.94 4.08 3.63 3.66 3.87 3.85 3.9 2.61 Result Chaotic Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Change the miR-17-92 Degradation parameter 10 8 k -0.32 0.11 -0.06 0.32 0.41 0.03 0.34 -0.09 Permutation Entropy 4.17 3.71 3.63 3.66 3.84 3.85 3.9 0.00 Result Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Change the Variable Order parameter K=2 k -0.3 0.72 0.98 -0.01 0 -0.05 -0.47 0.95 Permutation Entropy 3.76 2.77 3.94 3.91 0.55 4.65 3.77 2.92 Result Periodic Chaotic Chaotic Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Chaotic Phase Plane Plots for Chaotic States P-Q Plots Hurst Exponent test for Long Term Memory Hurst Exponent MYC E2F1 RB1 CDK4 CDC25A CDK2 CDKN1B miR-17-92 Normal Cell 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.92 0.89 0.85 0.91 0.94 Cancer Cell 0.94 0.99 0.97 1 0.95 0.99 0.95 0.63 Stochastic System Results Chaos Test Gene Name MYC E2F1 RB1 CDK4 CDC25A CDK2 CDKN1B miR-17-92 Without Change in parameters k - 0.26 -0.45 -0.18 0.04 0.32 0.11 -0.06 Permutation Entropy - 3.96 4.35 4.51 5.22 5.46 4.39 4.14 Result Stochastic Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Change the Delay parameter 10 k 0.38 0.12 0.01 0.12 0.06 -0.01 0.01 -0.24 Permutation Entropy 4.38 3.77 4.7 4.33 4.34 4.4 4.31 4.54 Result Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Change the MYC Self-Synthesis Rate parameter 50 1 k 0.93 -0.14 -0.54 -0.21 0.08 0 0.2 -0.02 Permutation Entropy 4.22 5.22 4.35 4.51 5.42 5.41 4.39 4.14 Result Chaotic Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Change the miR-17-92 Degradation parameter 10 8 k - -0.51 -0.14 0.13 0.27 0.28 -0.05 -0.31 Permutation Entropy - 3.99 4.35 4.51 5.11 5.48 4.39 0.21 Result Stochastic Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Change the Variable Order parameter K=2 k -0.31 0.15 -0.08 0.32 0.34 0.14 0.98 0.06 Permutation Entropy 4.55 3.73 4.39 3.54 5.64 4.6 4.42 4.53 Result Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic Chaotic Periodic Comparison with previous works . Modeled gene expression signals for PSK cell with (t ) 0.8 . Variable order effects Variable order effects Variable order effects Average Value of (t ) MYC E2F1 RB1 Normal Cell 0.15 0.32 0.30 Cancer Cell 0.14 0.19 0.16 CDK4 CDC25A CDK2 CDKN1B 0.26 0.09 0.38 0.17 0.17 0.11 0.17 0.15 miR-1792 0.14 0.31 What we found • the nonlinear variable order fractional systems have very good flexibility in adapting to real data. • Regulatory networks in cancer cells actually have a larger delay parameter than in normal cells. • It is also possible to create chaos, periodic and quasi-periodic oscillations by changing the delay, degradation and synthesis rates. • Profound effect of time-varying order on GRN, which may be related to a type of cellular memory due to epigenetic and environmental factors. What we found • By changing the delay parameter and the variable order function for a normal cell system, its behavior changes and becomes quite similar to the behavior of a cancer cell. • This work also confirms the effective role of the miR-17-92 cluster in the cancer cell cycle. Thank You