Un-rules for Good
Writing
1
2
3
4
. Don’t use no double negatives.
. Make each pronoun agree with
their antecedent.
. Join clauses
good like a
conjunction should.
. About them
sentence fragments.
Slide 5.1
5. When dangling, watch your
participles.
6. Verbs has to agree
with their subject.
7. Just between you and
I, case is important too.
8. Don’t write run-on
sentences they are hard
to read.
Slide 5.2
9. Don’t use commas, that aren’t necessary.
10. Try to not ever split infinitives.
11. Its’ important to use your apostrophes
correctly.
12. Proofread your
writing to see if
you any words
out.
Slide 5.3
13. Correct spelling is esential.
14. A preposition is a poor word
to end a sentence with.
Slide 5.4
Pseudo-Statements
Not
tested by degree of correspondence
with actual events
Slide 5.5A
Pseudo-Statements
Not
tested by degree of correspondence
with actual events
1. Definitions:
statements that
assert that one
term may be
substituted
for another
Slide5.5B
Pseudo-Statements
Not
tested by degree of correspondence
with actual events
1. Definitions:
(evaluated for
usefulness)
Slide5.5
statements that
assert that one
term may be
substituted
for another
Pseudo Statements
2. Tautologies: statements that must
be true by their very construction
People are lazy because they are
unmotivated.
Charismatic leaders are hopeful
because they are optimistic.
Sensationalism in the news uses
exaggerations.
Slide 5.6
Pseudo Statements
3. Contradictions: statements that
must be false due to their very
construction
A noisy quiet
original copy
“fresh frozen”
Bosnian government
jumbo shrimp
Slide5.7
Categorical Syllogism
Major
Premise: All men are mortal
Minor premise: Socrates is a man
Conclusion: (Therefore,) Socrates is mortal
Slide 5.8
Euler’s Circles
Things that
are Mortal
Men
Slide 5.9A
Euler’s Circles
Things that
are Mortal
Men
Socrates
Slide 5.9B
Euler’s Circles
Things that
are Mortal
Men
Socrates
Slide 5.9C
Major Term
Euler’s Circles
Things that
are Mortal
Major Term
Men
Minor Term
Socrates
Slide 5.9D
Euler’s Circles
Things that
are Mortal
Major Term
Men
Middle Term
Minor Term
Socrates
Slide 5.9
Conditional Syllogism Forms
Major
Premise: If p, then q
Minor
Premise: p
Conclusion:
Slide 5.10
q
or
not q
not p
Logic of the Conditional Syllogism
Major Premise:
If a newscaster is credible, then the news
broadcast will be respected by the public
Minor Premise:
A newscaster is credible
Conclusion:
the news broadcast will be respected by the
public
Slide 5.11
Logic of Using Hypotheses
Major Premise:
If a newscaster is credible, then the news
broadcast will be respected by the public
Minor Premise:
the news broadcast is not respected by the
public
Conclusion:
A newscaster is not credible
Slide 5.12
Denying the Antecedent in
Research
Major Premise:
If a newscaster is credible, then the news
broadcast will be respected by the public
Minor Premise:
A newscaster is not credible
Conclusion:
the news broadcast still may be respected
because it has a strong public affairs division
Slide 5.13
Affirming the Consequent
Research
Major Premise:
If the RCQ is a valid measure, then much
valuable research will have been spawned
Minor Premise:
much valuable research has been spawned
Conclusion:
the RCQ is a valid measure
Slide 5.14
Errors in Research Arguments
Fallacies
of Overgeneralization
Hasty Generalizations
Extrapolation
Fallacies of Distraction
Personal Attacks
Appeals to Authority
Appeals to Ignorance
Begging the Question
Slide 5.15